It appears that the President can "veto" parts of a spending appropriation by ignoring it.
O.k. How about Congress sending bills to an executive agency for approval? Sound like Emperor "prerogative" to me.
Congress must kow tow to Obamama!
Why not disband these assholes and have the Emperor run thing.
With the Supreme Court' permission, of course. (appointed by the president)
Read the whole piece and see what you think:
O.k. How about Congress sending bills to an executive agency for approval? Sound like Emperor "prerogative" to me.
Congress must kow tow to Obamama!
Why not disband these assholes and have the Emperor run thing.
With the Supreme Court' permission, of course. (appointed by the president)
Read the whole piece and see what you think:
Obama Outlines Plan to Curb Earmarks - WSJ.com
House Democratic leaders and House Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey agreed with Mr. Obama's proposed new rules and said any requested earmarks also should be submitted to the appropriate executive-branch agency for a 20-day review of the project to ensure its legality and worth.
But the proposals immediately met with skepticism from spending watchdogs and outright opposition in the Senate. Senate aides said Majority Leader Harry Reid (D., Nev.) saw the proposals -- especially the mandatory executive review -- as too restrictive.
No comments:
Post a Comment