Sunday, October 30, 2011

As I've posted before....

Send everybody a big check and we will spend or save it and some banks and companies will survive and some wont.

That means campaign bribery wont mean squat so don't hold your breath but that is the cure even if right wingers think it's socialism or something.

P.s Nixon, a conservative, gave us the earned income tax and that's pretty much a big check for being poor and having babies. So, call it an earned income tax for the rest of us.

Click on the jump and read the whole article.

interfluidity » Monetary policy for the 21st century
Here’s my proposal. We should try to arrange things so that the marginal unit of CPI is purchased with “helicopter drop” money. That is, rather than trying to fine-tune wages, asset prices, or credit, central banks should be in the business of fine tuning a rate of transfers from the bank to the public. During depressions and disinflations, the Fed should be depositing funds directly in bank accounts at a fast clip. During booms, the rate of transfers should slow to a trickle. We could reach the “zero bound”, but a different zero bound than today’s zero interest rate bugaboo. At the point at which the Fed is making no transfers yet inflation still threatens, the central bank would have to coordinate with Congress to do “fiscal policy” in the form of negative transfers, a.k.a. taxes. However, this zero bound would be reached quite rarely if we allow transfers to displace credit expansion as the driver of money growth in the economy. In other words, at the same time as we expand the use of “helicopter money” in monetary policy, we should regulate and simplify banks, impose steep capital requirements, and relish complaints that this will “reduce credit availability”. The idea is to replace the macroeconomic role of bank credit with freshly issued cash.

Of course we will still need investors. But all that transfered money will become somebody’s savings, and having reduced the profitability of leveraged financial intermediaries, much of that will find its way to some form of equity investing.

Saturday, October 29, 2011

Does it make sense to save money?....

If your interest payment is 1% and inflation plus taxes is 5% why pile up money and lose your principle. In the depression times we are experiencing we might better borrow, right?

So how do we set this up?

How about a free and clear credit card for emergencies and using personal loans for shopping for large purchases?

I'm not neglecting retirement accounts like my 401k which has a match of 6% so if Patti and I put in $5000 a year Walmart puts in a matching $5000. (It's amazing that so few contribute!)

Anyways, my thinking is to continue to pay off my vehicle loans and then use the free and clear vehicles as collateral for 4 percent loans.

Make sense?

Now, I have my old pickup truck free and clear and can also use it as an emergency fund so I can relax as far as that goes. Should be able to get $5000 if I need it so I'm resting easy right now, how about you?

Friday, October 28, 2011

Thursday, October 27, 2011

Well, this weekend I put the garden to bed....

Below 30 temperatures did a number on it but that's Idaho for you. have a ton of Bell peppers and tomatoes this year and can't wait  til next.

Will post a Youtube vid this week end.

Wednesday, October 26, 2011

I'm for Cain.....

Be fun to see Obama go after Cain for being a real American black. Or something. Of course, all Obama has to do is run on his record.

Here's a list of some his accomplishments:

Lost a filibuster proof Congress, passed a health care bill that no one knows what's in it and no one wants it, bailed out his pay masters on Wall Street, raised the price of used cars, revitalized the Republican party that was dead in 2008, threatened to cut Social Security and Medicare if the Republicans would only agree and destroy their election chances, and gave a lot of speeches that no one remembers.

There's probably more great accomplishments but nobody cares.

Now can he be beat?

It would be tough for Romney, a liberal Republican, to even do as well as McCain in 2008. At least Mac was a war hero to soften his Liberal image and Romney is a super rich guy who wears funny underwear.

Perry, a lot of money on hand, can stick around for quit awhile. He sounds like Bush only dumber so some liberal media types will keep him around.

So that leaves the Republican black guy. Lot of fun on TV, libertarian (not liberal) on abortion,  pro military spending, pays lip service to budget balancing, etc. Only thing he has to do is talk up Obama's economic non policy and remind people that Oba mama is a liar.

The rest are of the Republican field is toast because the media likes controversy and Cain v.s Obama is it and the white guys (and Bachman) are boring!

Tuesday, October 25, 2011

i don't think killing Middle East dictators is working....

Every time we do oil prices sky rocket. Guess what that means for you and me.

Notice no one is talking about it now as proof is in the pudding.. Take apart the Empire and we all suffer.

Must be a lesson here somewhere, don't you think?

Monday, October 24, 2011

This will end badly......

Now the gang will need to bail out the new loans and pay off these. Pretty soon all the Euros in the world will have to be borrowed to bail out the current loans.

Can you spell PONZI!

Most Greek bailout money has gone to pay off bondholders - The Washington Post
BRUSSELS — More than half of the money lent to Greece so far by the International Monetary Fund and European nations has gone to repay bondholders, a transfer of billions of dollars from taxpayers around the world to European banks and pension funds that invested in the troubled Mediterranean nation.

As the country struggles with a collapsing economy, violent strikes and historic levels of unemployment, a new analysis of an international bailout program shows the degree to which money provided to support Greece has been used to pay off its debts to the private sector.

44

Comments

Weigh In
Corrections?

inShare

Gallery

 These leaders run the institutions that control interest rates and monetary policies that have been making recent headlines.

Video
Oct. 21 (Bloomberg) -- Johannes Jooste, portfolio strategist at Merrill Lynch Wealth Management, discusses European Central Bank monetary policy and its bond-purchase program. He speaks with Francine Lacqua on Bloomberg Television's "On the Move." (Source: Bloomberg)

Oct. 21 (Bloomberg) -- Johannes Jooste, portfolio strategist at Merrill Lynch Wealth Management, discusses European Central Bank monetary policy and its bond-purchase program. He speaks with Francine Lacqua on Bloomberg Television's "On the Move." (Source: Bloomberg)

More on this Story

In Europe, new fears of German might
Most Greek bailout money has gone to pay off bondholders
PHOTOS: Exploring the worst-case scenarios
Europe faces a summit strikeout

View all Items in this Story

Under an initial bailout program approved by the IMF and the European Union in May 2010, Greece’s government has been kept afloat by international loans that total $91 billion.

About $52 billion of that has been used to repay bonds that came due between the start of the program and last month, according to a review of the program done for European leaders gathered in Brussels to address financial problems in the 17-nation euro zone.

European banks are among the heaviest investors in Greek bonds. Officials in some developing countries have argued that the IMF, run by a European-dominated board and two consecutive French managing directors, seemed more interested in protecting private investors in Europe than it did when overseeing programs that wiped out dozens of banks during the Asian financial crisis.

Sunday, October 23, 2011

A foreign country?...

What planet are these guys on?

California approves carbon market rules | Reuters
Reuters) - California regulators on Thursday approved final regulations for a carbon market that is one of the biggest U.S. responses to climate change.

The state believes the market for greenhouse gases, which starts in 2013, will let it address global warming in a low-cost way and become the center of alternative energy industries, like solar, although some businesses fear higher energy prices.

The most populous U.S. state is moving ahead with the plan years after federal regulators rejected a similar idea for the nation, partly on concerns of the effect on businesses.

The California Air Resources Board voted 8-0 to adopt the market regulations, which officials said are critical to the state's goal of cutting carbon emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 -- about a 22 percent reduction from forecasted business-as-usual output.

Power companies and factories will be able to trade a gradually decreasing number of permits to emit carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases under the so-called cap-and-trade plan, which counts on market forces leading companies to find the cheapest way to cut emissions.

About 350 companies representing 600 California factories and oil refineries must begin complying with the program in

Friday, October 21, 2011

All troops out of Iraq.....

Must be an election year, right? One less lie for team Obama.

Thursday, October 20, 2011

I did.....

Good old credit unions. great service, great loan rates, convenience, and free services!

CBC.ca | Day 6 | Bank Transfer Day
A new movement is picking up steam, and it isn't Occupy Wall Street. It was sparked by a woman in Los Angeles who is urging people to close their accounts with big banks, and transfer their savings to not-for profit-credit unions. And she wants everyone to make the move by November 5th - the day she's calling "Bank Transfer Day". Kristen Christian spoke to Brent from Los Angeles.

Wednesday, October 19, 2011

Yea, the good old days....



Where White Man Went Wrong
Indian Chief ‘Two Eagles’ was asked by a white U.S. government official, “You have observed the white man for 90 years. You’ve seen his wars and his technological advances. You’ve seen his progress and the damage he’s done.”

The Chief nodded in agreement.

The official continued, “Considering all these events, in your opinion where did the white man go wrong?”

The Chief stared at the government official and then replied, “When white man find land, Indians running it, no taxes, no debt, plenty buffalo, plenty beaver, clean water. Women did all the work, Medicine man free. Indian man spend all day hunting and fishing; all night having sex.”

Then the chief leaned back and smiled, “Only white man dumb enough to think he could improve system like that.”

Tuesday, October 18, 2011

Sunday, October 16, 2011

Your next, Vets.....

Told you they want to take your check and Medical benefits. Add that to the Social Security rape that's coming and it's time to clean house in Washington!

McCain open to changes in military health benefits - Washington Times
WASHINGTON (AP) — The top Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee is recommending that a special committee searching for ways to slash the deficit consider some of President Barack Obama’s proposed changes to health and retirement benefits for the military.

In a letter to the bipartisan panel, Arizona Sen. John McCain signaled he was open to cost-saving steps in military benefits, a move certain to send shock waves through Congress and among powerful groups of retired officers and veterans resistant to change.

The Associated Press obtained a copy of the letter.

The Pentagon’s health care costs have skyrocketed from $19 billion in 2001 to $53 billion, but lawmakers and various groups argue that members of the military and their families sacrifice far more than the average American, with a career that includes long and dangerous deployments overseas that overshadow civilian work

Saturday, October 15, 2011

Who got the money?......

What kind of black hole sucked up all these billions? The money is out there somewhere looking for a home. And it's all American so eventually it will come here.

But someone robbed these investors, don't you think? I'm assuming that most were pension and insurance funds gambling on the boom.

401 k money. Mine and yours. Still like Wall Street?

How Have the Bankers Done in the Lesser Depression?
How Have the Bankers Done in the Lesser Depression?

Investors in Goldman Sachs have lost more than half their money since 2007:

Goldman Sachs Group Inc The GS US Stock Quote Analysis Bloomberg

Investors in Morgan Stanley have lost more than three-quarters of their money since 2007:

Morgan Stanley MS US Stock Quote Analysis Bloomberg

Investors in Citigroup have lost 93% of their money since 2007:

Citigroup Inc C US Stock Quote Analysis Bloomberg

Investors in Bank of America have lost 85% of their money since 2007:

Bank of America Corp BAC US Stock Quote Analysis Bloomberg

Investors in Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, and Merrill Lynch lost more than 90% if their investments as well…

Talk about a bunch of people who had a really strong financial incentive for reflation...



Friday, October 14, 2011

Thursday, October 13, 2011

I'll keep track of anyone who knows the solution....

debt jubilee and send us a check. Sounds incredible but that's the only way out of a depression. broke dicks can't spend or borrow enough to kick start the economy.

Most employed people are paying down debt and saving for retirement. The unemployed are sharing a cardboard box or moving in with Dad and Mom.

How about you? Buying a new house next year? Car? Going to borrow big to start a business? Will you find a new job? Or will you be unemployed?

Then what?

Now multiply your position with a hundred million or so and you will understand.

We are broke? You can't give your house away for the mortgage on it.

Might be room under a bridge if the damn thing doesn't fall on your head!

It's in all our interests to understand how to stop another Great Depression | George Monbiot | Comment is free | The Guardian
President Obama justified the bank bailout on the grounds that "a dollar of capital in a bank can actually result in eight or 10 dollars of loans to families and businesses. So that's a multiplier effect." But the money multiplier didn't happen. The $1.3 trillion that Bernanke injected scarcely raised the amount of money in circulation: the 110% increase in M0 money led not to the 800% or 1,000% increase in M1 money that Obama predicted, but a rise of just 20%. The bail-outs failed because M0 was not the cause of the crisis. The money would have achieved far more had it simply been given to the public. But, as Angela Merkel and Nicolas Sarkozy demonstrated over the weekend, governments have learnt nothing from this failure, and seek only to repeat it.

Instead, Keen says, the key to averting or curtailing a second Great Depression is to reduce the levels of private debt, through a unilateral write-off, or jubilee. The irresponsible loans the banks made should not be honoured. This will mean taking many banks into receivership. Otherwise private debt will sort itself out by traditional means: mass bankruptcy, which will generate an even greater crisis.

Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Coffee and gas prices were bad enough...

Now we're getting serious!

Stock Up on Peanut Butter Now Before Prices Get Ridiculous
Stock Up on Peanut Butter Now Before Prices Get Ridiculous

The time to buy peanut butter is now, friends. The Wall Street Journal reports that prices for Jif, Peter Pan, and other peanut butter jars will be going up as much as 40% starting in a couple of weeks.

In just one year, the wholesale price of peanuts has skyrocketed from $450 a ton to $1,150 a ton, thanks to Mother Nature and human folly. As a result:

Wholesale prices for big-selling Jif are going up 30% starting in November, while Peter Pan will raise prices as much as 24% in a couple weeks...Skippy [prices] are 30% to 35% higher than a year ago. Kraft Foods Inc., which launched Planters peanut butter in June, is raising prices 40% on Oct. 31

Invest now in a few jars of your favorite peanut butter brand (and, presumably, peanuts too) before this food staple becomes a luxury item.

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Look what the gang gets for a billiion or so....

Pretty good deal. Tax cuts, no regulations, no prosecutions and you get to live in the best neighborhoods.

Pretty much what the French nobility had in 1790.

Two Political Parties For The Prices Of $1,188,644,055 | ZeroHedge
The next time someone tells you that political party X is not entirely purchased by Wall Street, specifically Goldman, Merrill (aka Bank of Countrywide Lynch) and Morgan Stanley, or that Barack Obama is not the most "gifted" politician in history, show them the following infographic...

Monday, October 10, 2011

Not a nickels difference, no really.....

Oba mama has been bought and their is nothing anyone can do about it. And the next president will be also. Get used to it because it perfectly legal to give these guys money and for them to reciprocate quid pro quo.

The goal is for the gang on Wall Street to get your Social Security and Medicare money. PERIOD!

New Economic Perspectives: Don’t Let Him Get Away With It
The problem facing Mr. Obama is obvious enough: How can he hold the support of moderates and independents (or as Fox News calls them, socialists and anti-capitalists), students and labor, minorities and others who campaigned so heavily for him in 2008? He has double-crossed them – smoothly, with a gentle smile and patronizing patter talk, but with an iron determination to hand federal monetary and tax policy over to his largest campaign contributors: Wall Street and assorted special interests' cash. The Democratic Party’s Rubinomics and Clintonomics core operators, plus smooth Bush Administration holdovers such as Tim Geithner, not to mention quasi-Cheney factotums in the Justice Department.

President Obama’s solution has been to do what any political demagogue does: Come out with loud populist campaign speeches that have no chance of becoming the law of the land, while more quietly giving his campaign contributors what they’ve paid him for: giveaways to Wall Street, tax cuts for the wealthy (euphemized as tax “exemptions” and mark-to-model accounting, plus an agreement to count “income” as “capital gains” taxed at a much lower rate).

So here’s the deal the Democratic leadership has made with the Republicans. The Republicans will run someone from their present gamut of guaranteed losers, enabling Mr. Obama to run as the “voice of reason,” as if this somehow is Middle America. This will throw the 2012 election his way for a second term if he adopts their program – a set of rules paid for by the leading campaign contributors to both parties.

Sunday, October 09, 2011

This will give you a better idea.....



Michael Hudson - Occupy Wall St & 'Obama's attempt to hi-jack' (6-Oct-11)(POLITICAL ECONOMY)

Saturday, October 08, 2011

Romney can't win in the south.....

He makes John McCain look like a fire breathing Reagan, for Christ's sake. And he comes across as "slick" which reminds Republicans of Clinton.

Perry is in deep do do because of his immigration amnesty for illegals children rewarded people for bringing children into the country and soaking the taxpayers who can't afford college for their own kids!

And the religious fanatics will never vote for a Mormon!

The Crash and Burn Death Spiral of the Perry Campaign | RedState
the majority of my tea party will do the same and believe they can’t trust a single word the media writes or utters(sadly FOX is now also in this category), short of Perry committing murder or a felony crime, all of these people will still vote for him. The same cannot be said about Romney- we hear an alarming amount of people stating(mostly the seniors) that they will not vote for him period. If there is a third party they will vote for that person instead . One elderly guy said very matter of factly to me,” If these young voters turn out to be fools and decide to go for ANOTHER greasy car salesman who will say anything to be elected then let them own it, I ain’t gonna live for ever and I will not vote for a non conservative, so if all that is left is a protest vote-so be it” I’ve said this many times, but IMHO, Romney cannot be elected in the South- he is pro/anti/pro/anti abortion and both he and his wife donated to Planned Parenthood,he is a decidedly anti-2nd amendment, big government, AGW believing, pro taxing and the real clincher is Romney care. Even selecting a Rubio or a southern VP will not save him with those stances. He has no chance whatsoever in our area. These meetings only solidify for me the feeling out here away from the D.C. beltway and metro areas.

Friday, October 07, 2011

Read 'em and weep....

Want to save the country? Fire the assholes in Washington. Any of them that have been there over 5 or 6 years and start over. 

How Capital Crushed Labor - HUMAN EVENTS
U.S. wages are higher than they are almost anywhere else. Our health, safety and environmental laws are among the most stringent. Our affirmative action demands are the most exacting, except possibly for those of Malaysia and South Africa.

Does the cost of production here in America alone explain the decline in manufacturing and stagnation of workers' wages?

No. For since the Revolution, America has had a standard of living that has been the envy of the world. From the Civil War through the 1920s, as we became the greatest manufacturing power the world had ever seen, our workers enjoyed pay and benefits that were unmatched anywhere.

Yet our exports in those decades were double our imports, and our trade surpluses annually added 4 percent to the gross national product. How did we do it?

We taxed the products of foreign factories and workers and used the revenue to finance the government. We imposed tariffs of up to 40 percent on foreign goods entering our market and used the tariff money to keep taxes low in the United States.

We made foreigners pay a price to get their products into our market and made them pay to help finance our government. We put our own country and people first.

For corporate America, especially industrial America, this was nirvana. They had exclusive free access to our market, and foreign rivals had to pay a stiff fee, a tariff, to get their products in and try to compete with U.S. products in the U.S. market.

Thursday, October 06, 2011

Why does the left think Oba mama is one of them?....

Because he ran as a Democrat? Must be. But he can't seem to leave invading countries left and right.  Of course. no president can buck the industrial-military establishment so I guess he has to keep using up those weapons and keep these fat cats giving him those big campaign contributions.

When ever anyone says there is a big difference between the Republicans and the Democrats, other than their bullshit, just re-read the above.

All politicians are hand picked by the money guys and then you get to vote for the pathetic clowns  presented as "the people's choice".

Do you really think they get all excited over which one wins? No. But they went nuts when Ross Perot pounded them into the sand and they had to force him out to quit ruining the feed bag.

Right now Oba mama is doing just fine by them as he made sure the gang got made whole from all the crimes they committed robbing you out of your home equity and 401k's. Now all they have to do is keep this  idiot to rob our Social Security and VA checks, right?

You think they won't?

Imagine the fees if 200 or 300 billion from Social Security went directly into the stock market, hmm? Think they might be tempted to fix a few elections?

And why do they laugh at Ron Paul? Can you imagine how ridiculous he would look killing the Defense budget?

How about an honest woman like Michelle Bachman? The poor thing doesn't have a clue on how our system works. No woman can win the nomination on the right? Too many people think woman are too flighty and emotional to handle the job let alone stand toe to toe with foreign leaders.

Cain is interesting as I've pointed out before. I think black is the way to go. Takes race baiting off the table but can the whites in the south support him? He has no political experience which is a plus for me because he'll be able to tell a lot of suck holes to drop dead. Of course, another great thing is he won't have Congress getting much done unless the Democrats get completely destroyed and lose control of the Senate then Congress might pass a bunch of big time budget cuts and we crash again.

Romney's toast! Northern liberals should just join the Democrats and get it over with! Bad enough he's a Mormon who wears magical underwear (all the devout wear special underwear considered sacred) but his pro-abortion, pro-illegal immigration, and especially, pro-gun control screws him royal!

Perry... Kind of guy you'd probably whore around with but he sure looks stupid. I mean even G.W. couldn't hold a candle to this guy. But in a match up between him and Romney, he's the nominee.

The rest don't matter. They are just on a traveling expense paid vacation. Some will be gone in a few weeks some will campaign forever, like Romney.

But the Empire is relatively safe as Oba mama looks much better next year when it comes down to nut crunching time and he gathers a half billion dollars or so to campaign with.

Now, he has a great deal of problems with his own base but they have no where to go because they are dewy eyed dreamers of Messianic bliss who only  pay attention to the elite who will simply tax the wealthy into the poor house to pay for handouts to the favored amongst us.

Get it?

And the Conservatives will hold their noses and vote for the same expert elites (the faces change but the same gang pulls the strings) who got us into this DEPRESSION in the first place!

William Blum :: Anti-Empire Report, Number 95
Libya: Unending American hostility

If I could publicly ask our beloved president one question, it would be this: "Mr. President, in your short time in office you've waged war against six countries — Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia, Yemen and Libya. This makes me wonder something. With all due respect: What is wrong with you?"

The American media has done its best to dismiss or ignore Libyan charges that NATO/US missiles have been killing civilians (the people they're supposedly protecting), at least up until the recent bombing "error" that was too blatant to be covered up. But who in the mainstream media has questioned the NATO/US charges that Libya was targeting and "massacring" Libyan civilians a few months ago, which, we've been told, is the reason for the Western powers attacks? Don't look to Al Jazeera for such questioning. The government of Qatar, which owns the station, has a deep-seated animosity toward Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi and was itself a leading purveyor of the Libyan "massacre" stories, as well as playing a military role in the war against Tripoli. Al Jazeera's reporting on the subject has been so disgraceful I've stopped looking at the station.

Alain Juppé, Foreign Minister of France, which has been the leading force behind the attacks on Libya, spoke at the Brookings Institution in Washington on June 7. After his talk he was asked a question from the audience by local activist Ken Meyercord:

"An American observer of events in Libya has commented: 'The evidence was not persuasive that a large-scale massacre or genocide was either likely or imminent.' That comment was made by Richard Haass, President of our Council on Foreign Relations. If Mr. Haass is right, and he's a fairly knowledgeable fellow, then what NATO has done in Libya is attack a country that wasn't threatening anyone; in other words, aggression. Are you at all concerned that as NATO deals more and more death and destruction on the people of Libya that the International Criminal Court may decide

Wednesday, October 05, 2011

Tuesday, October 04, 2011

Obama has to be ecstatic if this guy is his opponent.....

Give me the black guy. At least he has class and more brains than this turnip.

I posted before that the Republican's field of candidates were pygmies but no one wanted to believe me. 

Hey, the worst thing that could happen if this guy is elected but the second worse thing would be that Oba mama is elected .


So I guess we are screwed!

Rick Perry's Spectacular Fall From Grace | Mother Jones
Just to recap, in less than two months Rick Perry has:

Suggested that maybe Ben Bernanke should be lynched.
Declined to back off his contention that Social Security is an unconstitutional Ponzi scheme.
Called climate change a "contrived phony mess" that was cooked up by scientists who have "manipulated data so that they will have dollars rolling in to their projects."
Pissed off the conservative base by defending his decision to (in Michele Bachmann's immortal words) give "government injections" to "innocent little 12-year-old girls." Said Perry condescendingly: "What I don't get is what parents don't understand about an opt out."
Further pissed off the conservative base by suggesting that if you disagree with his policy on in-state tuition for illegal immigrants, "I don't think you have a heart."
Mangled a prepackaged debate attack on Mitt Romney so badly, and then followed up with a statement on Pakistan so inscrutable, that even his supporters started to wonder if he has a three-digit IQ.
Proposed that U.S. troops should be used to fight Mexican drug lords. In Mexico.
Had to defend himself against revelations that his family leases a hunting spot called "Niggerhead."

Monday, October 03, 2011

We still are in the toilet......

Not much to brag about in the economy. I don't expect much change until after the elections are over and all those new faces in Congress go after the budget.

Prepare for the worse!

Sales at the store are still soft but we are all still working and people are being hired. I expect to pay more for insurance as the gang on Wall Street sticks it to the little guy who is still working.

In depression periods like this a paycheck is like gold. Even bankrupt people will be given loans as the banks run out of customers. Interest rates are as close to zero to maintain prices and profits but change is a coming.

The "normal" boom after a recession I predicted is still a fizzle as the various state governments and most business' are cutting personnel.

In the meantime, those of us with jobs and credit are becoming VIP's. My credit union lends me money without down payments and told me they won't even bother checking my credit report!

I posted years ago get you budget in order, pay off your debts, borrow on free and clear assets and save as much as you can in your retirement account in U.S. bonds.

And I warned everyone about house or rent payments! The blood suckers won't do you any favors so don't buy a house using a bank. Plenty of people will take payments so don't tell me it can't be done.

Personally. I'm sticking to buying mobile homes and paying them off. You'd be surprised how good it feels to only pay $ 180 bucks a month on lot rent and save 400 or 500 a month. Especially come retirement time when I get my Social Security check and can go back into business and travel again after the Depression we are in alleviates. (Don't worry it will crash again because our economy is run by gangsters and idiots!)

If you want to get an idea when recovery is happening watch the price of oil. As it's price  goes down for an extended period  and gas price speculation ends the world economy booms.

Of course, This assumes the  main impetus for it to go down is when the pension funds finally settle down and quit speculating in commodities.

Be a while so don't bet the farm!

Periods of depression are no fun as fear pushes trillions of dollars back and forth in the market place and no steady investments can be done.

But the biggest reason for fear is the clowns in Washington. Can you see anyone there that you trust? Or even stand? Hopefully we'll get a new bunch to complain about because these guys are really hopeless.

Stay tuned.

Saturday, October 01, 2011

Make sure you use their card......

You'd have to be the stupidist shit on the planet to bank with these people. But they didn't get rich and huge because smart people bank with them and not use a credit union did they?

BofA has been ripping people off for years and guess what?......

These nitwits deserved it!

Have to emphasise time to pay down debts and clean up your credit as the economy tanks. I don't see much change coming until the 2012 elections are over. if your ready you can even get more bargains as the world economy deflates and interest rates continue to be so small as to be immaterial. For instance:

The monthly payment for borrowing 20 thousand for a car at 0 % over 5 years is  333.4 dollars per month. I can borrow 20000 at my credit union at 2.69 % for 5 years at approximately 350 a month. You'd save approximately 16 dollars a month, the price of a pizza.

You can see from the above that lowering interest rates is a waste of time because broke people don't borrow money from banks only from soft touch relatives and loan sharks last time I checked.

And consumers are still broke and will be as long as we slash government spending and take away their checks.

We can argue about reducing government spending during a boom and I can tell you a lot of our problems stem from cutting taxes on the rich under Bush and not shrinking the government under the Democrats in Congress.

But right now the voters are pissed from the liars in Washington bailing out the gang on Wall Street screwing us out of our homes and retirement monies.

And it will be exciting to watch the heads role next year and the new guys running around in Washington trying to stop the DEPRESSION!

Bank of America to charge $5 monthly fee for debit card purchases - latimes.com
Most Bank of America customers will soon see a new charge on their statements -- $5 for any month in which they use a BofA debit card to make a purchase.

Consumers should prepare for more such charges, analysts say, as big banks strive to recover revenue they have lost to financial reforms adopted in the aftermatch of the economic meltdown.

The new Bank of America fee will be phased in early next year, said Anne Pace, a spokeswoman for BofA, the nation's largest retail bank.

Customers will still be able to use their cards at the bank's automated teller machines without being charged, the bank said Thursday.

They also can make debit purchases free if they have a mortgage from Bank of America or if they have a total of $20,000 on deposit at Bank of America and in certain Merrill Lynch accounts (you may recall that Bank of America's corporate parent bought Merrill Lynch as the financial crisis set in).

The bank, like others, has been testing ways to recover debit-card revenue that is going away because of new regulations.


Friday, September 30, 2011

Don't tax the gang on Wall Street....

Better rob the geezers, the sick, the working stiff and vets because they don't bribe the politicians. Of course, too many don't vote to stop it so I guess we deserve it.

Why Don’t the Deficit Hawks Want to Tax Wall Street? | Op-Eds & Columns
What is most remarkable in this picture is the complete failure of the media to identify Wall Street’s role in pushing this deficit reduction agenda. For example, Erskine Bowles, who was a co-chair of President Obama’s deficit commission, is never identified as a director of Morgan Stanley.

It is entirely possible that this role has no influence on Bowles’ views on the deficit, but it still seems that public should know about it. If a commission member were receiving $350,000 a year from the United Auto Workers or AFSCME, it is difficult to imagine that the media would not include this fact as part of the commissioner’s standard identification.

The media also see little reason to balance the Wall Street influence with people presenting an alternative perspective. For example, the Post ran a news article on the budget last week featuring the views of two people who headed Peter Peterson-funded organizations. These views were complimented by the views of an unnamed Republican staffer and a long-time corporate lobbyist. This was Fair and Balanced reporting at the Post.

In short, it is hard to understand why taxing financial speculation never appears on the agenda of the deficit hawks or gets mentioned in budget reporting, if the issue really is deficit reduction. On the other hand, if this is all about using an economic crisis to push a longstanding agenda to cut Social Security and Medicare, then everything suddenly makes sense.


Thursday, September 29, 2011

What good is American citizenship?.......

And you wonder why I don't support any of these gangsters any more.

Oba mama has continued all of Bush's unconstitutional programs and refuses to do anything to solve our economic problems.

Assassinating American citizens is a crime against his own constituents. I don't care if the citizen is a traitor only that the constitution guarantees us a fair trial.

Where does this policy end? Do we allow the murder of Tea Party members? How about protestors in the street? Liberal voters?

How about killing you?

Confirmed: Obama authorizes assassination of U.S. citizen - Glenn Greenwald - Salon.com
No due process is accorded. No charges or trials are necessary. No evidence is offered, nor any opportunity for him to deny these accusations (which he has done vehemently through his family). None of that.

Instead, in Barack Obama's America, the way guilt is determined for American citizens -- and a death penalty imposed -- is that the President, like the King he thinks he is, secretly decrees someone's guilt as a Terrorist. He then dispatches his aides to run to America's newspapers -- cowardly hiding behind the shield of anonymity which they're granted -- to proclaim that the Guilty One shall be killed on sight because the Leader has decreed him to be a Terrorist. It is simply asserted that Awlaki has converted from a cleric who expresses anti-American views and advocates attacks on American military targets (advocacy which happens to be Constitutionally protected) to Actual Terrorist "involved in plots." These newspapers then print this Executive Verdict with no questioning, no opposition, no investigation, no refutation as to its truth. And the punishment is thus decreed: this American citizen will now be murdered by the CIA because Barack Obama has ordered that it be done. What kind of person could possibly justify this or think that this is a legitimate government power?

Wednesday, September 28, 2011

Can't win?......

Didn't the Republicans get their asses handed to them in 2008 by a black guy? Maybe they should fight back with their own.

Be a lot of fun. The Dem's could call him a racists and he could call them crackers.

Or everybody could bitch about lack of choices in the election..LOL! 

By the way, it won't make any difference if one party or the other doesn't get veto proof or filibuster proof majorities in Congress.

Thankfully grid lock will keep the bastards busy and out of our pockets. By the way, does anyone think raising taxes on the "rich" won't come out of our pockets?

Or will they just bribe their guys in Congress and get a handout to pay those evil taxes!



Cain's message resonates with rank-and-file Republicans - Politics Wires - MiamiHerald.com
By STEVEN THOMMA
McClatchy Newspapers

WASHINGTON -- Long-shot Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain calls his surprise victory in a Florida straw poll over the weekend a victory of message over media, and he may well be right.

The Atlanta business executive and two-time campaign loser has long been overshadowed by news media attention to rivals such as Rick Perry and Mitt Romney. He doesn't have their campaign money. He doesn't have their resumes in politics - he lost the only two times he ran for office before. And he doesn't get asked many questions in media-sponsored debates.

But he appeals to many rank-and-file Republicans with a deep voice and direct message that's based on his record as a successful businessman, a can-do delivery that doesn't knock other Republicans and a proposal for a flat tax that touches deep in the Republican DNA of loathing for the Internal Revenue Service.

These assets helped him surge past his more prominent rivals in the Florida poll Saturday, winning 37 percent of the vote, more than Perry's 15 percent and Romney's 14 percent combined.

"People are listening to the message and not just, with all due respect, to the media," Cain said on NBC, finding himself suddenly in demand for TV appearances.

Tuesday, September 27, 2011

Why is my future Social Security check so small......

Politics.

Want to make the deficit look smaller? Screw the old geezers out of their cost of living increases! Oh don't worry, the gang in Washington will keep their big retirement and health benefits. And, let's not forget, Wall Street will get multimillion paychecks from our taxes.

We need more than a tea party who mean well but are simply out of touch on how are system works to put an end to the corruption. Maybe simply firing everybody in D.C is the ticket?

Sign me up!!!!

Monday, September 26, 2011

Another member of the gang runs his big mouth....

This guy has been part of the problem because he wants our Social Security funds put into Wall Street. He, and many others that I call main stream con artists, have been lying about Social Security for years.

Let me state this for everyone's benefit: As long as this country exists our government which owns the system of money creation can never go broke, bankrupt, out of business, no longer able to afford to keep it's promises in American dollars, or unwillingly or unknowingly take away our benefits.

If the Feds do so it means that YOU VOTED FOR IT!!!!!

I also consider it a political attack on the Republicans which they deserve for scaring old people with all this cut the federal budget and throw millions of people out of work so we can beat Obama!!

Here is my response I've posted to this guys bullshit let me know what you think:

Gary Causer


(URL)


on

Sep 26, 3:29 AM

said:







SS is the return that I earned for working for
almost 50 years which is a contract between me and my government. It
doesn't matter how long I live, how much I have put into it, or how I
use it.

For all the con-artist trying to steal it:

 It's my money and you
will have Hell to pay to steal it.


My immediate family, 9 total, are
voters and will never vote for any criminals touching our insurance that
we will depend on in our old age.



Remember, every penny of these checks will be spent and every penny will
eventually enter your paychecks from that spending and be taxed and returned to the
Treasury. If you are serious about this so called problem then simply
have the general fund pay any short fall. Better yet, give everybody a
job, whether they want one or not, and the issue becomes self correcting.



P.s my family are almost all Republicans to the core!




Yes, Social Security Is A Ponzi Scheme—And The Government Is Again Giving People Houses With No Money Down
In the U.S., Texas Governor Perry touched the third rail of Social Security and called it a Ponzi scheme, which of course immediately made him the leading candidate in the "shoot the messenger" category.

Behind the rhetoric, we look at some actual numbers. No, not the unfunded liabilities, that's too easy. Let's look at what a heartless, un-compassionate man President Roosevelt was when he started Social Security (and that's what many will call me after reading this!).

Behind the tongue-in-cheek, there are some very real issues that do not get addressed when we talk about Social Security, but that need to be part of the discussion. And of course, we must start off with the results of the FOMC meeting, which has me feeling not at all amused. What are they thinking? Apparently, they are seeing the results from another, alternative universe. There is a lot to cover as I head off to London, where I will finish this letter.

Saturday, September 24, 2011

This guy definately gets it...

The consumer is broke. So cut him a check and get on with our lives. This is not an economic problem but a political problem. The gang that owns our government are screwing us big time!!

We gave them all that stimulus and they banked the money and bought and speculated in oil, food and currencies. Give us the money and we will pick the winners in the corporate world with our spending and take the power away from these crooks.

interfluidity » Monetary policy for the 21st century
Here’s my proposal. We should try to arrange things so that the marginal unit of CPI is purchased with “helicopter drop” money. That is, rather than trying to fine-tune wages, asset prices, or credit, central banks should be in the business of fine tuning a rate of transfers from the bank to the public. During depressions and disinflations, the Fed should be depositing funds directly in bank accounts at a fast clip. During booms, the rate of transfers should slow to a trickle. We could reach the “zero bound”, but a different zero bound than today’s zero interest rate bugaboo. At the point at which the Fed is making no transfers yet inflation still threatens, the central bank would have to coordinate with Congress to do “fiscal policy” in the form of negative transfers, a.k.a. taxes. However, this zero bound would be reached quite rarely if we allow transfers to displace credit expansion as the driver of money growth in the economy. In other words, at the same time as we expand the use of “helicopter money” in monetary policy, we should regulate and simplify banks, impose steep capital requirements, and relish complaints that this will “reduce credit availability”. The idea is to replace the macroeconomic role of bank credit with freshly issued cash.

Of course we will still need investors. But all that transfered money will become somebody’s savings, and having reduced the profitability of leveraged financial intermediaries, much of that will find its way to some form of equity investing.

There are details to consider. Won’t this proposal render central banks almost immediately insolvent? After all, conventionally, currency is a liability of a central bank that must be offset by some asset, or the balance sheet will show a gigantic hole where the bank’s equity ought to be. But that’s easy to remedy. Central banks can just adopt an old accounting fudge and claim that policy-motivated transfers purchase an intangible asset called “goodwill”. But, you may object, fudging the accounts doesn’t alter economic realities. Quite so! But what are the economic realities here? Balance sheet insolvency is nothing more or less than a predictor of illiquidity. No firm goes out of business because it’s shareholder equity goes negative. Firms die when they are presented with a bill that they cannot cover. But a central bank with liabilities in its own notes can never be illiquid, since it can produce cash at will to satisfy any obligation. It is book insolvency, not intangible goodwill, that would misrepresent the economic condition of the bank. If the central bank does not pay interest on reserves (which it should not), currency’s status as a “liability” is entirely formal. Central bank accounts should be defined by economic substance, not by blind analogy to the accounts of other firms. The purpose of a central bank’s balance sheet is to present a snapshot of its cumulative interventions, not to measure solvency. Consistent with that objective, a placeholder asset that offsets the formal liability incurred from past transfers would render transparent the cumulative stock and net flow of policy-motivated transfers. [1]

Then there are more interesting problems, like how routinizing transfers from the central bank to citizens might reshape society. “Free money” would certainly carry consequences, both good and bad, foreseeable and unforeseeable. My suggestion would be that the central banks should make equal transfers to all adult citizens irrespective of income, job, or tax status. That would be simple to understand and administer, and it is “fair” on face. It has other good points. To the degree that transfers are motivated by wasteful idleness of real resources (e.g. unemployment), flat transfers are guaranteed to put money in the hands of cash-constrained people who will spend it. Flat transfers are much more effective stimulus than income tax


Friday, September 23, 2011

When you try to kill a king.....

You better succeed or you get it right in the ass! Makes you wonder why these guys  are rounded up after giving millions in campaign contributions  but they went after Oba mama by embarrassing him by downgrading the countries credit rating after the President kissed the Republicans ass to fix the problem and so  now they suffer.

First the CEO is fired and now the investigations begin and I wouldn't be surprised if a whole bunch of these scum aren't sent to prison or at least, ruined financially because of the cost of lawyers.

We needed more but that's what you get in "democracy" where all government offices are for sale!

SEC Launches Major Investigation Into S&P Downgrade | The Nation
he SEC is examining specific trades that bet against the stock market and were made right before Standard & Poor’s issued the downgrade. The market lost 634.76 points after the announcement, a 5.5 percent drop—this would have produced an enormous windfall for those traders.

Sources told the Journal that “unusually broad” subpoenas have been issued to some hedge funds, trading shops, and other Wall Street outfits asking for information about certain trades. The SEC wants to know who made the trades, who was the first to hear about the Standard & Poor’s downgrade, and whom they heard it from.

In addition, it’s possible that Standard & Poor’s itself has been subpoenaed. Any leaks would logically have come from either the company or the Treasury Department, which was alerted to the move. Sources told the Journal that, at the very least, the SEC has asked Standard & Poor’s to disclose which employees knew about the looming downgrade—and a spokesperson for Standard & Poor’s would not comment on whether they received a subpoena.

While it’s conceivable a Treasury Department official tipped off some Wall Street traders about the downgrade, Standard & Poor’s has a well-known and comfy relationship with Wall Street—which pays the company’s fees—and this might make it a more likely suspect.

The Journal notes that Standard & Poor’s met with large bond investors in the weeks leading up to the downgrade, and some of those investors are not commenting on whether they’ve received subpoenas:

Thursday, September 22, 2011

Which party are you supprting....

Never mind!

The Center of the Universe » Blog Archive » Senator Warner, Democrat, announces bipartisan group of 38 senators to encourage super committee to “go big” on deficit reduction
beowulf Says:
September 22nd, 2011 at 12:38 pm

“IN AMERICA, WE have a two-party system,” a congressional staffer is supposed to have told a visiting group of Russian legislators some years ago.
“There is the stupid party. And there is the evil party. Periodically, the two parties get together and do something that is both stupid and evil. This is called…bipartisanship. Peter Brimelow

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

Governments run deficits and the economy grows....

But the problem with deficit spending is not pay back the deficit but the government giving money to people who support the politicians.

Are we ever in favor of corruption? Just look at  Solyndra ,

Oba mama giving 500 million for solar power and the company 2 years later filing for bankruptcy. How's that for stimulus?

What should government do to boost jobs?

Send me and you a check!!!

A negative income tax would work but the gangsters in Washington would probably have to get honest jobs. Instead, they will threaten social Security, Medicare or Defense spending and you will vote for this gang again!

After all, that's why they let you vote!!!

Here's how a modern fiat system works if you are curious:
 
3 essential features in Modern Money | Modern Money Mechanics
Within a modern monetary economy, as a matter of national accounting, the sovereign government deficit (or surplus) equals the non-government surplus (or deficit), also known as the private sector (and here includes the international sector). The failure to recognise this relationship is the major oversight of the current orthodox analysis.

In aggregate, there can be no net savings of financial assets of the non-government sector (private sector) without cumulative government deficit spending. The sovereign government via net spending (deficits) is the only entity that can provide the non-government sector (private sector) with net financial assets (net savings) and thereby simultaneously accommodate any net desire to save and hence eliminate unemployment.

Additionally, and contrary to current orthodox rhetoric, the systematic pursuit of government budget surpluses is necessarily manifested as systematic declines in private sector savings.

The decreasing levels of net private savings which are manifest in the public surpluses increasingly leverage the private sector. Adopting a growth strategy that relies on increasingly leveraging the private sector is unsustainable. So you have to trace the private indebtedness back to the conduct of the government sector.

Monday, September 19, 2011

back to cost cutting....

Patti's doctor bills adding up. Even with insurance so debating my options. One is to get rid of the Direct TV account which I'm going to do as soon as Dexter season is over and save 68 bucks a month. Another is sell my f250 pickup and pay off Patti's car and just quit using credit cards for cash back purchases.

One way we save is by buying our groceries at Christmas time and stock up on coffee, flour, sugar and especially can goods. We get a 10% discount for the holidays and I will spend $500 or so.

Winter coming so the electric bill triples and I would rather squirrel the money away on my 401k than give it to the electric company. But the worse thing about winter is the inevitable cut in hours at work.

So, plan now and avoid surprises because the economy is going to suck for a long time to come with the coming election and the politicians blaming: Bush, global warming, evil rich guys, old geezers not dying fast enough, Fox news, illegal Mexicans taking jobs from lazy white people,

and don't forget poor people ripping off food stamps instead of starving like good people with class would!!!

 

Saturday, September 17, 2011

Where does the money come from?.....

Nowhere. Read this explanation and see what you think.

The Center of the Universe » Blog Archive » from prof Andrea Terzi
This is an excellent question. Where does the money that the Government borrows come form? And the answer is: It comes from the Treasury and the Fed! And it cannot come from any other source. This is what so few people realize, perhaps because economists are too reluctant to explain.


When the Government ‘borrows’, it sells Treasury securities and receives reserves from banks. Bank reserves are deposits at the Fed owned by banks. Deposits at the Fed can only come into existence through two channels:
1. Government spending (e.g., when the Treasury buys output from business or pays federal employees); and
2. Fed lending (e.g., when the Fed makes loans to banks).
This means that the money that government borrows (bank reserves) ultimately comes from the Treasury or from the Fed.


This simple statement has significant consequences:
-The Government does not borrow money created by others,
-The Government does not borrow anything it cannot create itself,
-The Government has no functional need to borrow,
-The Government issues securities because if it did not, the banks would have an excessive amount of reserves and the interest rate would go to zero,
-When the Government borrows, it functionally makes monetary policy (in the same way as the Fed doing open market operations),
-Governments self inflict deficit and debt rules onto themselves that are causing the world economy to collapse
-Rules for governments that aim to promote jobs and prosperity should be:
1. Do not overtax the economy for any desired size of the government sector;
2. Let deficits grow until we reach full employment;
3. Do ‘quality spending’ to create jobs and control prices.

Friday, September 16, 2011

I think Krugman is starting to get it...

A sovereign nation can never go broke in it's own currency. It can simply create it. Only desperate  governments like Zimbabwe's will print notes and flood their economy because their banks have collapsed after robbing the white guys who knew what the fuck they were doing.

After all is said and done inflation and small budget deficits are  a sign that the economy is working, and hyperinflation can only occur if the sovereign nation's central bank refuses to stop the inflation with increasing interest rates, government corruption is rampant, no effective tax collection, (as in Greece) or if the sovereign nation gives up it's money to foreign bankers, ala Europe today and last but not least if the officials start printing currency and  give it to their favorites!

An Impeccable Disaster - NYTimes.com
Now, a country with its own currency, like Britain, can short-circuit this process: if necessary, the Bank of England can step in to buy government debt with newly created money. This might lead to inflation (although even that is doubtful when the economy is depressed), but inflation poses a much smaller threat to investors than outright default. Spain and Italy, however, have adopted the euro and no longer have their own currencies. As a result, the threat of a self-fulfilling crisis is very real — and interest rates on Spanish and Italian debt are more than twice the rate on British debt

Thursday, September 15, 2011

Gee. who would have thought this....

Give Oba mama a campaign contribution and he gives you a 500 million loan. then you go bankrupt and just wear did the 500 million go?

Good thing the Supreme Court ruled this stuff as legal, ain't it?

You see supply side stimulus doesn't work! Send me and you the money and we will spend every fucking dime and revive demand in the economy instead of financing criminal gangs in Washington and Wall Street.

Oh yea, Perry took bribes from Merck and gave them a fortune in state funds to immunize little girls.

You can't make this shit up!!

Before Collapse and Goverment Investigations, Solar Company Solyndra Was a Rising Star - OpenSecrets Blog | OpenSecrets
President Barack Obama, the No. 1 beneficiary of campaign cash from Solyndra's employees, received $2,800. Of this amount, $2,300 came from Ben Bierman, Solyndra's executive vice president of engineering, with $1,300 coming during Obama's 2008 presidential bid and $1,000 being given to Obama in June.

Here is a table showing all of the beneficiaries of Solyndra's employee's political giving since 2006:

Recipient Party Total
Barack Obama D $2,800
Peter Schiff R $2,400
Democratic National Committee D $2,150
Barbara Boxer D $2,000
Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee D $1,450
Gabrielle Giffords D $1,250
Dave Camp R $1,000
Dianne Feinstein D $1,000
Mike Haridopolos R $1,000
Alan Khazei D $1,000
Lisa Murkowski R $1,000
Harry Reid D $1,000
David Sanders D $1,000
Mike Thompson D $1,000
Mary Bono Mack R $500
Steve Israel D $500
Priorities USA Action D $500
Hector Balderas D $250
Kevin Brady R $250
Jack Conway D $250
Libertarian National Committee L $250
EMILY's List Women Vote! D $250
Total: $22,800

Now, however, few politicians want to be seen as close to Solyndra, as questions are being raised about whether the company improperly secured a stimulus loan thanks to help from the Obama administration.

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Why were taxes invented....

Why not just steal what the government wants?

Works the first time it's done, then fuck you king we quit!

What is Debt? – An Interview with Economic Anthropologist David Graeber « naked capitalism
Taxes are also key to creating the first markets that operate on cash, since coinage seems to be invented or at least widely popularized to pay soldiers – more or less simultaneously in China, India, and the Mediterranean, where governments find the easiest way to provision the troops is to issue them standard-issue bits of gold or silver and then demand everyone else in the kingdom give them one of those coins back again. Thus we find that the language of debt and the language of morality start to merge.

In Sanskrit, Hebrew, Aramaic, ‘debt,’ ‘guilt,’ and ‘sin’ are actually the same word. Much of the language of the great religious movements – reckoning, redemption, karmic accounting and the like – are drawn from the language of ancient finance. But that language is always found wanting and inadequate and twisted around into something completely different. It’s as if the great prophets and religious teachers had no choice but to start with that kind of language because it’s the language that existed at the time, but they only adopted it so as to turn it into its opposite: as a way of saying debts are not sacred, but forgiveness of debt, or the ability to wipe out debt, or to realize that debts aren’t real – these are the acts that are truly sacred.

How did this happen? Well, remember I said that the big question in the origins of money is how a sense of obligation – an ‘I owe you one’ – turns into something that can be precisely quantified? Well, the answer seems to be: when there is a potential for violence. If you give someone a pig and they give you a few chickens back you might think they’re a cheapskate, and mock them, but you’re unlikely to come up with a mathematical formula for exactly how cheap you think they are. If someone pokes out your eye in a fight, or kills your brother, that’s when you start saying, “traditional compensation is exactly twenty-seven heifers of the finest quality and if they’re not of the finest quality, this means war!”

Tuesday, September 13, 2011

Watched a few minutes of the GOP debate....

Not only are they pygmies but whiny pygmies. More like a high school debating team if you ask me.

All Oba mama has to do is give pretty speeches while these guys rub their hands together and threaten our Social Security checks and he's in.

Lucky for the Repubs that Oba mama doesn't have a record of success or they lose Congress too!

For the first time in my life I'm not picking a winner this early because of budget cutting nonsense coming out of Washington even from Oba mama. As I've said before, not a nickels difference between the Dems and Repubs any more other than rhetoric!

And it's obvious the gang in government doesn't have a clue how to revive the dying system. All we hear is "don't raise taxes on the rich because they won't fund our campaigns." Or we need to make sure poor people pay taxes. Also, we need to soak the rich to pay for all our fun.

And most of all we need to put the Social Security trust fund into the stock market!

We know how well that worked out this century, right?

Monday, September 12, 2011

All government spending is someone's income..

And all government income is someone's taxes.

Read the above again.

Am I saying every dollar the government spends ends up as someone's paycheck?

Absolutely! The Federal government has no savings. Hell, it doesn't even have own any money! Remember there's no appropriation for the U.S government because it spends and get's it all back from taxes and doesn't need to own, keep or save money.

Now it takes awhile for this to happen but payments made and checks created in our economy by government spending becomes part our national income. 

Therefor when we pay taxes on this income (even the rich pay personal taxes to the Federal government tax authorities) it all goes back to the treasury where it came from in the first place.

Notice that the government has to "spend" the money before we get any of it. And it has to take it back in taxes for the system to work .

In accounting it's known as income-outgo. In our system, the government's outgo is called spending. It goes through the banking system and becomes part of our income (Social Security, government payroll, contractual payments, welfare, VA, etc. etc.)

And government income is our taxes coming back to the Treasury.

How does that work? Can we create money out of nothing?

We have been doing it for years. It's just no one ever explained how it's done because most everyone has been taught economics as if  we are still on a gold standard.

But we have been a pure fiat system since 1971 when Nixon told the French you can't have our gold.

Anyways, when the Congress passes a budget and the President signs the "appropriations" the authorization to spend sent to the treasury. The treasury authorizes the payments by crediting all the bank accounts that are legally authorized to have payments to. Then everybody authorized spends the money.

In due time all that money spent by the government comes back as taxes (read above again for an explanation) and the "appropriations" are paid thereby correcting any deficit.

How can the Federal government get away with it?

They create the money as stipulated under the constitution and can borrow from within it's bank accounts to float the transaction by borrowing from one account to another. This is accounted as deficits.

By the way, as alluded to above, deficits are the lag time between the Fed's spending and collecting the taxes and have nothing to do with destroying the economy, bankrupting the Fed, screwing our children over, giving the country away to the Chinese or any other nonsense the gangsters who own us can think of!

And another point, the only printing of money done is to replace worn out or torn and defaced bills not to spend us into the poor house.

But it sounds better to scare you if your told that the government is printing trillions to bankrupt us and vote for me and I'll stop the dirty bastards !!!

So, briefly, what is money?

First of all, in our fiat system, we have bank money which is a set of bank accounts in the Treasury, The Fed and our regular banks.

Second, we have currency: Bonds, bank drafts, money orders, credit cards, and good old cash. (Our currency is almost all created by borrowing from banks and credit unions).

But it's bank money that finances our federal system. It's simply when the government spends it pushes key strokes on Treasury computers
and authorizes checks and credits into these bank accounts.

How can they do that?

The full faith and credit of our economy which they control guarantees the system working. They always have the means to pay because they can type into computer terminals any amount authorized by Congress and signed by the President and the I.R.S can and will get it back.

Yes, they create the money from nowhere! It also goes back to nowhere! It's computing blips, electrons, and that's where they go when they click those keys.

It simply comes back as taxes and the "deficit" is paid off.

Got big deficits? Quit cutting taxes during booms! Create a few million jobs! Or quit worrying about it and problem solved.

What about hyperinflation?

If the economy over expands it creates too much money (stopping this is the job of the Congress by raising taxes and the Fed by raising interest rates slowing the economy) because our banks also create money out of nowhere and the tax mechanism doesn't work here. This leads to too much money in our hands and we borrow and spend just to keep up with price increases generated by people buying stuff in competition with each other.

In short, Speculating on price increases is big business and millions of people love to gamble and make the market for it. This leads to over bidding on assets and everybody ends up with a surplus of cash and no place to put it to keep up with mild inflation created by our Federal Reserve banking transactions  except in a few selected commodities: gold, real estate, foreign money, etc.

This activity leads to bidding wars on assets called inflation.

If corrective action isn't taken early the system explodes. (it's cure is mainly raising interest rates and taxes to remove extra money from the consumer).

What about Zimbabwe the only fiat nation to suffer hyperinflation? If you'll click on the link and you will see how corrupt governments work and end up printing currency to save their asses.

Our system doesn't need to print cash. It has the banking system to create all the money Congress authorizes.

Reread the above! All money problems, shortages, printing, borrowing, etc. etc. comes from our Congress. Not from the Gods, not from evil Jews, not from drunken Democrats unless they are in Congress, not from cheating on taxes, and especially because we don't have a gold standard .

We have a criminal problem and stupid, ignorant voter problem paying for and voting for the gangsters who are screwing us over!

For a more detailed explanation because I'm not an economist or a very good writer, go here.

Sunday, September 11, 2011

I don't normally agree with leftists....

But messing with Social Security is political suicide. If we really need to fund Social Security (we don't because we could print the bonds and sell them outright) all we do is make "all" income taxable and the problem goes away.

Also, it's only a matter of time til I, and most of my generation, gets a check that we will be depending on. This means an extra 60 million voters.

Or rioters.

Anyone remember the "catastrophic health care" bill passed by Congress 25 years ago? This was the copay plan for Medicare and seniors would be required to pay a couple of bucks for hospital stays. Boy, did the shit hit the fan!

The geezers invaded Washington by the thousands and Congress killed the bill immediately!

Remember that  politicians are not very brave and definitely not that smart to screw with that kind of power. And it doesn't hurt if they know my generation has  a 100 million guns out here!

Get the picture?

In the meantime, I still think that the Republicans have nothing but pygmies for the coming election and scaring grandpa by threatening to take away his hard earned SS check is not going to be very productive on the electoral front, do you?

And what about the liar in chief, Oba mama?

Big deal as long as he talks pretty and leaves their checks alone! After all, they're all liars and voters will feel we might as well settle down keep the one we got who can't get any new programs through Congress  blowing the budget.

And guys like me can simply bitch about both sides destroying what's left of our economy.

But eventually, the voters will throw them all out and hire some adults with a brain and solve the depression just like in the 30's.

Of course, that presupposes the guy wont be Hitler!!

P.s I'm going to have to write out how our "fiat" money system works but I don't like arguing with people who are convinced that governments can spend us into the poor house. They can't. What government spending does is create a system that controls everything you do and makes it impossible to live without government permission!

And that is much worse.


My pet theme is governments own us and are owned by the rich groups, who get together to stay rich, who bribe the politicians who control the government that controls us.

They use the budget deficit scare tactic to keep us on the run instead of rounding them up and prosecuting them for their crimes and screw ups.

You don't think our credit collapse fell out of the sky and bit us in the ass because it seemed like a good idea, do you?

Anyways, read what Perry, an immigration amnesty enthusiast, has to say about taking our checks:

  Rick Perry's Social Security Extremism: Why It Will Sink Him | Rolling Stone Politics | Taibblog | Matt Taibbi on Politics and the Economy
In politics, it's the same. Once a candidate like Perry comes out of the gate threatening Social Security, the game is up. All you have to do from there is make him say it, over and over again. Romney and Hunstman will obviously do just that. They have the next six months to make sure every elderly and soon-to-be elderly person in America knows that Rick Perry wants to take their checks away.

The other candidates ganged up on Perry last night and attacked him, in essence, from the left, trying to paint him as someone who will take away popular programs. The situation reminded me a little of 2004, when other Democrats suddenly started attacking a surging Howard Dean, calling him a wimp and a socialist who was "too liberal" to win a general election. Hackish grinders like Kerry turned Dean's antiwar stance (which happened to be morally right) into a political albatross, forcing him to own it in every public appearance while highlighting his own army cred.

The move succeeded in part, among other things because the press signed on to Kerry's logic and relentlessly portrayed Dean as a candidate with no chance to beat Bush. But the strategy also deflated the party's base, which violently opposed the war, and left the Dems with comparatively little energy and enthusiasm heading into the general election.

Saturday, September 10, 2011

We need the money to get the depression behind us....

Millions of broke, unemployed, and desperate people are not good for any country. We are not immune to the 100 million guns or more going off in this country.

However, giving us 30 bucks a week or so in payroll tax reduction is retarded at best. Wont even pay your electric bill!

The Center of the Universe » Blog Archive » Dallas address
I believe that the surest engine for full economic recovery is a full payroll tax holiday. Payroll taxes take away over 15% of everyone’s paycheck, from the very first dollar earned. This is big money- about $1 trillion per year. Half comes from the employee and half from the employer. A payroll tax holiday does not give anyone anything. What it does is stop taking away $1 trillion a year from working people struggling to make their payments and stay in their homes, and businesses struggling to survive. A full payroll tax holiday means a husband and wife earning $50,000 a year each will see their combined take home pay go up by over $650 a month, so they can make their mortgage payments and their car payments and maybe even do a little shopping.

This fixes the banks and fixes the economy, from what I call the bottom up. It fixes the banks without giving them anything more than people who can afford to make their payments. That’s all they need to remain viable.

And what all businesses need most to expand output and employment is people with spending money who can buy their products. Without people to buy goods and services, nothing happens. The payroll tax holiday also means there is also a big reduction in expenses for business. With competitive markets this means lower prices, which also helps consumers, helps keep inflation down, helps businesses compete domestically and in world markets to help optimize our real terms of trade, and helps keep the currency stable as the dollar is ultimately worth what it can buy. So with the payroll tax holiday we get a dramatic increase in economic activity, rising employment in good jobs, and better prices. And we’ll see millions of new jobs, because, again, what business needs most is people with money to buy their products. Then they hire and expand.

Friday, September 09, 2011

Not much chance of doing this.....

But why we don't is simply politics not economics. Everyone in Washington in any position of power are paid to maintain the status quo. We must protect the insurance industry, military-industrial complex banks, and especially Wall Street.

Read this guy and you'll see most of my idea on using health savings accounts like the plan we have at WalMart:

Universal Health Care Coverage
My proposal regarding health care is to give everyone over
the age of 18 a bank account that has, perhaps, $5,000 in it,
to be used for medical purposes. $1,000 is for preventative
measures and $4,000 for all other medical expenses. At the
end of each year, any unspent funds remaining of the $4,000
portion are paid to that individual as a “cash rebate.” Anything
above $5,000 would be covered by a form of Medicare. There
would be no restrictions on purchasing private insurance
policies.
This proposal provides for universal health care,
maximizes choice, employs competitive market forces to
minimize costs, frees up physician time previously spent
in discussion with insurance companies, rewards “good
behavior” and reduces insurance company participation.
This will greatly reduce demands on the medical system,
substantially increasing the supply of available doctor/patient
time and makes sure all Americans have health care. To
ensure preventative measures are taken, the year-end rebate More here

Thursday, September 08, 2011

Why would politicians of either party punish these guys....

If they did who would buy the elections for them, Hmm?

Washington's Blog
Market Watch senior columnist Brett Arends writes:

No one has been punished. Executives like Dick Fuld at Lehman Brothers and Angelo Mozilo at Countrywide, along with many others, cashed out hundreds of millions of dollars before the ship crashed into the rocks. Predatory lenders and crooked mortgage lenders walked away with millions in ill-gotten gains. But they aren’t in jail. They aren’t even under criminal prosecution. They got away scot-free. As a general rule, the worse you behaved from 2000 to 2008, the better you’ve been treated. And so the next crowd will do it again. Guaranteed.

Gretchen Morgenson and Louise Story point out in the New York Times that:

As the financial storm brewed in the summer of 2008 ... Federal prosecutors officially adopted new guidelines about charging corporations with crimes — a softer approach that, longtime white-collar lawyers and former federal prosecutors say, helps explain the dearth of criminal cases despite a raft of inquiries into the financial crisis.

Though little noticed outside legal circles, the guidelines were welcomed by firms representing banks. The Justice Department’s directive, involving a process known as deferred prosecutions, signaled “an important step away from the more aggressive prosecutorial practices seen in some cases under their predecessors,” Sullivan & Cromwell, a prominent Wall Street law firm, told clients in a memo that September.

Wednesday, September 07, 2011

Robbed them blind......

I love it when these crooks get took, LOL.

Veep robbed Citigroup blind - NYPOST.com
A legally blind, exCitigroup exec yesterday copped to embezzling more than $22 million from the New York banking giant and splurging on posh pads with gold-leaf ceilings -- and fancy cars he couldn’t even see well enough to drive.

Disgraced business honcho Gary Foster, 35, pleaded guilty in Brooklyn federal court to bank- fraud charges. He faces up to 10 years in prison as part of a plea deal.

While his impaired sight prevented him from sitting behind the steering wheel, Foster didn’t let that stop him from shelling out hundreds of thousands for a Ferrari, a Maserati GranTurismo and a BMW 550i, authorities said.


Monday, September 05, 2011

Another big shot economist who doesn't have a clue....

At least he admits he has been wrong. But his worrying over budget deficits spooking the markets and somehow effecting interest rates simply means he still doesn't have a clue.

During depressions history shows us that no one has money or credit so someone has to create it. Either forgive a large amount of debt, (in bible times it was called Jubilee, even they got it!) pay down the debts, or give everybody the money to get back on their feet.

Until we figure a way to get money into the citizens hands we are in a DEPRESSION because we are broke and can't recover if we don't have a job.

HELLO!

What To Do About Jobs?
What To Do About Jobs?

My talk from August 31, 2011:

It is hard to talk about macro right now. It is hard, in large part, because virtually all of us macroeconomists have been wrong over the past four years. Thus the past four years is that it’s been a great process of unlearning. And, distressingly, we have not been unlearning old things and learning true new things. We have, instead, been unlearning relatively new things but not replacing them with new new things. Instead, we have been going back to still older things. And these older things now appear to be more true than we imagined a decade ago, or indeed more true--at least for our economy right now--than economists have thought them at any time since 1950.

One way to look at the 60 years before 2007 in macroeconomics is as a long intellectual twlight struggle in which Milton Freedman in the end beat John Maynard Keynes, and beat him decisively. There were three major questions in macroeconomics on which Friedman and Keynes differed, and by 2007 an overwhelming majority of macroeconomists agreed with Friedman.

The first question was: Could central banks technocratically and apolitically do the macroeconomic stabilization jobs by themselves, or did they require help and assistance from the more political branches of government? Could central banks all by themselves make Say's Law that supply creates its own demand true in practice even if it wasn’t true in theory?

Sunday, September 04, 2011

It must be no golf game day.....

Oba mama tours the flooded area. Nothing but excitement from this guy, right?

Saturday, September 03, 2011

Color me sceptical.....

Take years and then the government will give them more money.

Isn't that where these crooks got the money in the first place?

Friday Night Fights: The FHFA Sues Everyone | The Reformed Broker
This was a doozy, dropped on the markets at the end of the day Friday...

The Federal Government (via the Federal Housing Finance Agency) is suing 17 financial institutions for like tens of billions of dollars over mortgage fraud and the credit crash. All your favorite dirtbags are named, even the ones that are now hiding under different brands (hello GMAC aka Ally Bank!).

Expect a ten-year dogfight followed by a massive catch-all deal a la the Global Settlement we saw stemming from the dot com boom/bust cycle not so long ago. No one will have learned anything when all is said and done but there will definitely be some clawbacks and redistribution of ill-gotten gains...finally.

The effect on the stock market will also not be pretty, but sometimes you gotta burn out the town to drive the bad guys out from their hiding holes.

Friday, September 02, 2011

Get ready for the "job crisis"...

yeah, Obama came back from vacation and went to the golf course and decided we must have a job crisis because too many people were on the course getting in his way.

Of course, a couple of years ago he could have fixed the problem because he and the Dems controlled Congress completely.

Then he lied to everybody who voted for him and gave all of our money to the crooks on Wall Street and the banks who got us into this mess.

Well, after another vacation he snuck into Washington and played golf with Boner and Boner stuck it up his ass. And the economy tanked even further and he had to take some time off.

After that vacation he announced he had a job program and it would be a cure for our problem as soon as he could swindle the Repubs who now own the House out of the money.

So he called up Boner and dingy Harry and ordered them to a summit to fix his fuck up. But boner said, ''no more Mulligans you s.o.b. I want to get reelected".

So that's why he'll get reelected because it's all (Bush's) Congress' fault and he worked reeeeaaaally hard to save our economy but couldn't get any of the bastard Republicans, who are stupid enough to obey their voters and tell him to go to Hell, to help him save our jobs!

Of course, I expect Congress to be big time Republican and then it will be an "interesting " time, don't you think?

P.s It's almost time for the President to go on vacation so expect another "Bush did it and it's not my fault" rant!!!Technorati Tags: ,

Thursday, September 01, 2011

Hey, these banks are doing you a favor...

That's why the fed's bailed them out. We can't live without the slimy bastards.

Do yourself a favor and open an account with a credit union and become part owner in an honest lending institution, you won't be sorry!

"We Have Accepted Your Deposit" as Opposed to "We Have Borrowed Your Money"
August 30, 2011
"We Have Accepted Your Deposit" as Opposed to "We Have Borrowed Your Money"

I have always found the rhetoric of banking very interesting, in a perverted sort of way...